- Documentation labels
- For a product change
- For all other documentation
- Post-merge reviews
The process for creating and maintaining GitLab product documentation depends on whether the documentation is associated with:
Delivered for a specific milestone and associated with specific code changes. This documentation has the highest priority.
It is usually not associated with a specific code change and has a lower priority.
Documentation is not usually required when a “backstage feature” is added or changed, and does not directly affect the way that any user or administrator interacts with GitLab.
Regardless of the type of issue or merge request, certain labels are required when documentation is added or updated. The following are added by the issue or merge request author:
- An appropriate type label. For example,
- The stage label and
group label. For example,
The following are also added by members of the Technical Writing team:
- A documentation scoped label with the
docs::prefix. For example,
~Technical Writingteam label.
This documentation is required for any new or changed feature and is:
- Created or updated as part of feature development, almost always in the same merge request as the feature code. Including documentation in the same merge request as the code eliminates the possibility that code and documentation get out of sync.
- Required with the delivery of a feature for a specific milestone as part of GitLab’s definition of done.
- Often linked from the release post.
Documentation for specific milestones involves the:
- Developer of a feature or enhancement.
- Product Manager for the group delivering the new feature or feature enhancement.
- Technical Writer assigned to the group.
Each role is described below.
Developers are the primary author of documentation for a feature or feature enhancement. They are responsible for:
- Developing initial content required for a feature.
- Liaising with their Product Manager to understand what documentation must be delivered, and when.
- Requesting technical reviews from other developers within their group.
- Requesting documentation reviews from the Technical Writer assigned to the DevOps stage group that is delivering the new feature or feature enhancements.
Because the documentation is an essential part of the product, if a ~feature issue also contains the ~documentation label, you must ship the new or updated documentation with the code of the feature.
Technical Writers are happy to help, as requested and planned on an issue-by-issue basis.
For feature issues requiring documentation, follow the process below unless otherwise agreed with the Product Manager and Technical Writer for a given issue:
- Include any new and edited documentation, either in:
- The merge request introducing the code.
- A separate merge request raised around the same time.
Use the documentation requirements developed by the Product Manager in the issue and discuss any further documentation plans or ideas as needed.
If the new or changed documentation requires extensive collaboration or conversation, a separate, linked issue can be used for the planning process.
- Use the Documentation guidelines, as well as other resources linked from there, including:
- Contact the Technical Writer for the relevant DevOps stage
in your issue or merge request, or within
#docson GitLab Slack, if you:
- Need any help to choose the correct place for documentation.
- Want to discuss a documentation idea or outline.
- Want to request any other help.
- If you are working on documentation in a separate merge request, ensure the documentation is merged as close as possible to the code merge.
- A policy for documenting feature-flagged issues is forthcoming and you are welcome to join the discussion.
Reviewers help ensure:
- Adherence to:
Prior to merging, documentation changes committed by the developer must be reviewed by:
- The code reviewer for the merge request. This is known as a technical review.
- Optionally, others involved in the work, such as other developers or the Product Manager.
- The Technical Writer for the DevOps stage group, except in exceptional circumstances where a post-merge review can be requested.
- A maintainer of the project.
Product Managers are responsible for the documentation requirements for a feature or feature enhancement. They can also:
- Liaise with the Technical Writer for discussion and collaboration.
- Review documentation themselves.
For issues requiring any new or updated documentation, the Product Manager must:
- Add the ~documentation label.
- Confirm or add the documentation requirements.
- Ensure the issue contains:
- Any new or updated feature name.
- Overview, description, and use cases, as required by the documentation structure and template, when applicable.
Everyone is encouraged to draft the documentation requirements in the issue, but a Product Manager will do the following:
- When the issue is assigned a release milestone, review and update the Documentation details.
- By the kickoff, finalize the documentation details.
Technical Writers are responsible for:
- Participating in issues discussions and reviewing MRs for the upcoming milestone.
- Reviewing documentation requirements in issues when called upon.
- Answering questions, and helping and providing advice throughout the authoring and editing process.
- Reviewing all significant new and updated documentation content, whether before merge or after it is merged.
- Assisting the developer and Product Manager with feature documentation delivery.
The Technical Writer:
- Reviews their group’s
~featureissues that are part of the next milestone to get a sense of the scope of content likely to be authored.
- Recommends the
~documentationlabel on issues from that list which don’t have it but should, or inquires with the PM to determine if documentation is truly required.
~directionissues from that list, reads the full issue and reviews its Documentation requirements section. Addresses any recommendations or questions with the PMs and others collaborating on the issue in order to refine or expand the Documentation requirements.
By default, the developer will work on documentation changes independently, but the developer, Product Manager, or Technical Writer can propose a broader collaboration for any given issue.
Additionally, Technical Writers are available for questions at any time.
- Provide non-blocking reviews of all documentation changes, before or after the change is merged.
- Confirm that the documentation is:
- Grammatically correct.
- Ensures that the documentation avoids:
- Bad file locations.
- Broken links.
The Technical Writer will review the documentation to check that the developer and code reviewer have ensured:
- Appropriate location, making sure the documentation is in the correct directories (often reflecting how the product is structured) and has the correct name.
- Syntax, typos, and broken links.
- Improvements to the content.
- Accordance with the:
Documentation is required for a milestone when:
- A new or enhanced feature is shipped that impacts the user or administrator experience.
- There are changes to the UI or API.
- A process, workflow, or previously documented feature is changed.
- A feature is deprecated or removed.
Requirements for the documentation of a feature should be included as part of the issue for planning that feature in a Documentation section within the issue description. Issues created using the Feature Proposal template have this section by default.
Anyone can add these details, but the Product Manager who assigns the issue to a specific release milestone will ensure these details are present and finalized by the time of that milestone’s kickoff.
Developers, Technical Writers, and others may help further refine this plan at any time on request.
The following details should be included:
- What concepts and procedures should the documentation guide and enable the user to understand or accomplish?
- To this end, what new page(s) are needed, if any? What pages or subsections need updates? Consider user, admin, and API documentation changes and additions.
- For any guide or instruction set, should it help address a single use case, or be flexible to address a certain range of use cases?
- Do we need to update a previously recommended workflow? Should we link the new feature from various relevant locations? Consider all ways documentation should be affected.
- Are there any key terms or task descriptions that should be included so that the documentation is found in relevant searches?
- Include suggested titles of any pages or subsection headings, if applicable.
- List any documentation that should be cross-linked, if applicable.
These documentation changes are not associated with the release of a new or updated feature, and are
backstage in GitLab, rather than
feature. They may include:
- Documentation created or updated to improve accuracy, completeness, ease of use, or any reason other than a feature change.
- Addressing gaps in existing documentation, or making improvements to existing documentation.
- Work on special projects related to the documentation.
Anyone can contribute! You can create a merge request for documentation when:
- You find errors or other room for improvement in existing documentation.
- You have an idea for all-new documentation that would help a GitLab user or administrator to accomplish their work with GitLab.
To update GitLab documentation:
- Follow the described standards and processes listed on the page, including:
- Follow GitLab’s Merge Request Guidelines.
Request help from the Technical Writing team if you:
- Need help to choose the correct place for documentation.
- Want to discuss a documentation idea or outline.
- Want to request any other help.
To request help:
- Locate the the Technical Writer for the relevant DevOps stage group.
- If urgent help is required, directly assign the Technical Writer in the issue or in the merge request.
- If non-urgent help is required, ping the Technical Writer in the issue or merge request.
If you are a member of GitLab’s Slack workspace, you can request help in
Anyone with Maintainer access to the relevant GitLab project can merge documentation changes. Maintainers must make a good-faith effort to ensure that the content:
- Is clear and sufficiently easy for the intended audience to navigate and understand.
- Meets the Documentation Guidelines and Style Guide.
If the author or reviewer has any questions, they can mention the writer who is assigned to the relevant DevOps stage group.
The process involves the following:
- Primary Reviewer. Review by a code reviewer or other appropriate colleague to confirm accuracy, clarity, and completeness. This can be skipped for minor fixes without substantive content changes.
- Technical Writer (Optional). If not completed for a merge request prior to merging, must be scheduled post-merge. Schedule post-merge reviews only if an urgent merge is required. To request a:
- Maintainer. For merge requests, Maintainers:
- Can always request any of the above reviews.
- Review before or after a Technical Writer review.
- Ensure the given release milestone is set.
- Ensure the appropriate labels are applied, including any required to pick a merge request into a release.
- Ensure that, if there has not been a Technical Writer review completed or scheduled, they create the required issue, assign to the Technical Writer of the given stage group, and link it from the merge request.
The process is reflected in the Documentation merge request template.
If you have ideas for further documentation resources please create an issue using the Documentation template.
If not assigned to a Technical Writer for review prior to merging, a review must be scheduled immediately after merge by the developer or maintainer. For this, create an issue using the Doc Review description template and link to it from the merged merge request that introduced the documentation change.
Circumstances where a regular pre-merge Technical Writer review might be skipped include:
- There is a short amount of time left before the milestone release. If there are less than three days remaining, seek a post-merge review and ping the writer via Slack to ensure the review is completed as soon as possible.
- The size of the change is small and you have a high degree of confidence that early users of the feature (for example, GitLab.com users) can easily use the documentation as written.
- At GitLab, we treat documentation like code. As with code, documentation must be reviewed to ensure quality.
- Documentation forms part of the GitLab definition of done.
- That pre-merge Technical Writer reviews should be most common when the code is complete well in advance of a milestone release and for larger documentation changes.
- You can request a post-merge Technical Writer review of documentation if it’s important to get the code with which it ships merged as soon as possible. In this case, the author of the original MR will address the feedback provided by the Technical Writer in a follow-up MR.
- The Technical Writer can also help decide that documentation can be merged without Technical writer review, with the review to occur soon after merge.
Ensure the following if skipping an initial Technical Writer review:
- That product badges are applied.
- That the GitLab version that introduced the feature has been included.
- That changes to headings don’t affect in-app hyperlinks.
- Specific user permissions are documented.
- That new documents are linked from higher-level indexes, for discoverability.
- Style guide is followed: