- Component project
- Use a component
- Write a component
- CI/CD Catalog
- Convert a CI/CD template to a component
- Use a GitLab.com component in a self-managed instance
- CI/CD component security best practices
- Troubleshooting
CI/CD components
- Introduced as an experimental feature in GitLab 16.0, with a flag named
ci_namespace_catalog_experimental
. Disabled by default. - Enabled on GitLab.com and self-managed in GitLab 16.2.
-
Feature flag
ci_namespace_catalog_experimental
removed in GitLab 16.3. - Moved to beta in GitLab 16.6.
- Made generally available in GitLab 17.0.
A CI/CD component is a reusable single pipeline configuration unit. Use components to create a small part of a larger pipeline, or even to compose a complete pipeline configuration.
A component can be configured with input parameters for more dynamic behavior.
CI/CD components are similar to the other kinds of configuration added with the include
keyword,
but have several advantages:
- Components can be listed in the CI/CD Catalog.
- Components can be released and used with a specific version.
- Multiple components can be defined in the same project and versioned together.
Instead of creating your own components, you can also search for published components that have the functionality you need in the CI/CD Catalog.
For an introduction and hands-on examples, see Efficient DevSecOps workflows with reusable CI/CD components.
For common questions and additional support, see the FAQ: GitLab CI/CD Catalog blog post.
Component project
- The maximum number of components per project changed from 10 to 30 in GitLab 16.9.
A component project is a GitLab project with a repository that hosts one or more components. All components in the project are versioned together, with a maximum of 30 components per project.
If a component requires different versioning from other components, the component should be moved to a dedicated component project.
Create a component project
To create a component project, you must:
-
Create a new project with a
README.md
file:- Ensure the description gives a clear introduction to the component.
- Optional. After the project is created, you can add a project avatar.
Components published to the CI/CD catalog use both the description and avatar when displaying the component project’s summary.
-
Add a YAML configuration file for each component, following the required directory structure. For example:
spec: inputs: stage: default: test --- component-job: script: echo job 1 stage: $[[ inputs.stage ]]
You can use the component immediately, but you might want to consider publishing the component to the CI/CD catalog.
Directory structure
The repository must contain:
- A
README.md
Markdown file documenting the details of all the components in the repository. - A top level
templates/
directory that contains all the component configurations. You can define components in this directory:- In single files ending in
.yml
for each component, liketemplates/secret-detection.yml
. - In sub-directories containing
template.yml
files as entry points, for components that bundle together multiple related files. For example,templates/secret-detection/template.yml
.
- In single files ending in
README.md
file that provides more detailed information, and can be linked from the top-level README.md
file. This helps to provide a better overview of your component project and how to use it.You should also:
- Configure the project’s
.gitlab-ci.yml
to test the components and release new versions. - Add a
LICENSE.md
file with a license of your choice that covers the usage of your component. For example the MIT or Apache 2.0 open source licenses.
For example:
-
If the project contains a single component, the directory structure should be similar to:
├── templates/ │ └── my-component.yml ├── LICENSE.md ├── README.md └── .gitlab-ci.yml
-
If the project contains multiple components, then the directory structure should be similar to:
├── templates/ │ ├── my-simple-component.yml │ └── my-complex-component/ │ ├── template.yml │ ├── Dockerfile │ └── test.sh ├── LICENSE.md ├── README.md └── .gitlab-ci.yml
In this example:
- The
my-simple-component
component’s configuration is defined in a single file. - The
my-complex-component
component’s configuration contains multiple files in a directory.
- The
Use a component
To add a component to a project’s CI/CD configuration, use the include: component
keyword. The component reference is formatted as <fully-qualified-domain-name>/<project-path>/<component-name>@<specific-version>
,
for example:
include:
- component: $CI_SERVER_FQDN/my-org/security-components/secret-detection@1.0.0
inputs:
stage: build
In this example:
-
$CI_SERVER_FQDN
is a predefined variable for the fully qualified domain name (FQDN) matching the GitLab host. You can only reference components in the same GitLab instance as your project. -
my-org/security-components
is the full path of the project containing the component. -
secret-detection
is the component name that is defined as either a single filetemplates/secret-detection.yml
or as a directorytemplates/secret-detection/
containing atemplate.yml
. -
1.0.0
is the version of the component.
Pipeline configuration and component configuration are not processed independently. When a pipeline starts, any included component configuration merges into the pipeline’s configuration. If your pipeline and the component both contain configuration with the same name, they can interact in unexpected ways.
For example, two jobs with the same name would merge together into a single job.
Similarly, a component using extends
for configuration with the same name as a job in your pipeline
could extend the wrong configuration. Make sure your pipeline and the component do not share
any configuration with the same name, unless you intend to override
the component’s configuration.
To use GitLab.com components in a self-managed instance, you must mirror the component project.
Component versions
In order of highest priority first, the component version can be:
- A commit SHA, for example
e3262fdd0914fa823210cdb79a8c421e2cef79d8
. - A tag, for example:
1.0.0
. If a tag and commit SHA exist with the same name, the commit SHA takes precedence over the tag. Components released to the CI/CD Catalog should be tagged with a semantic version. - A branch name, for example
main
. If a branch and tag exist with the same name, the tag takes precedence over the branch. -
~latest
, which always points to the latest semantic version published in the CI/CD Catalog. Use~latest
only if you want to use the absolute latest version at all times, which could include breaking changes.~latest
does not include pre-releases, for example1.0.1-rc
, which are not considered production-ready.
You can use any version supported by the component, but using a version published to the CI/CD catalog is recommended. The version referenced with a commit SHA or branch name might not be published in the CI/CD catalog, but could be used for testing.
Semantic version ranges
- Introduced in GitLab 16.11
When referencing a CI/CD catalog component, you can use a special format to specify the latest semantic version in a range.
To specify the latest release of:
- A minor version, use both the major and minor version numbers in the reference,
but not the patch version number. For example, use
1.1
to use the latest version that starts with1.1
, including1.1.0
or1.1.9
, but not1.2.0
. - A major version, use only the major version number in the reference. For example,
use
1
to use the latest version that starts with1.
, like1.0.0
or1.9.9
, but not2.0.0
. - All versions, use
~latest
to use the latest released version.
For example, a component is released in this exact order:
1.0.0
1.1.0
2.0.0
1.1.1
1.2.0
2.1.0
2.0.1
In this example, referencing the component with:
-
1
would use the1.2.0
version. -
1.1
would use the1.1.1
version. -
~latest
would use the2.1.0
version.
Pre-release versions are never fetched when referencing a version range. To fetch
a pre-release version, specify the full version, for example 1.0.1-rc
.
Write a component
This section describes some best practices for creating high quality component projects.
Manage dependencies
While it’s possible for a component to use other components in turn, make sure to carefully select the dependencies. To manage dependencies, you should:
- Keep dependencies to a minimum. A small amount of duplication is usually better than having dependencies.
- Rely on local dependencies whenever possible. For example, using
include:local
is a good way to ensure the same Git SHA is used across multiple files. - When depending on components from other projects, pin their version to a release from the catalog rather than using moving target
versions such as
~latest
or a Git reference. Using a release or Git SHA guarantees that you are fetching the same revision all the time and that consumers of your component get consistent behavior. - Update your dependencies regularly by pinning them to newer releases. Then publish a new release of your components with updated dependencies.
Write a clear README.md
Each component project should have clear and comprehensive documentation. To
write a good README.md
file:
- The documentation should start with a summary of the capabilities that the components in the project provide.
- If the project contains multiple components, use a table of contents to help users quickly jump to a specific component’s details.
- Add a
## Components
section with sub-sections like### Component A
for each component in the project. - In each component section:
- Add a description of what the component does.
- Add at least one YAML example showing how to use it.
- If the component uses inputs, add a table showing all inputs with name, description, type, and default value.
- If the component uses any variables or secrets, those should be documented too.
- A
## Contribute
section is recommended if contributions are welcome.
If a component needs more instructions, add additional documentation in a Markdown file
in the component directory and link to it from the main README.md
file. For example:
README.md # with links to the specific docs.md
templates/
├── component-1/
│ ├── template.yml
│ └── docs.md
└── component-2/
├── template.yml
└── docs.md
For an example of a component README.md
, see the Deploy to AWS with GitLab CI/CD component’s README.md
.
Test the component
Testing CI/CD components as part of the development workflow is strongly recommended and helps ensure consistent behavior.
Test changes in a CI/CD pipeline (like any other project) by creating a .gitlab-ci.yml
in the root directory. Make sure to test both the behavior and potential side-effects
of the component. You can use the GitLab API if needed.
For example:
include:
# include the component located in the current project from the current SHA
- component: $CI_SERVER_FQDN/$CI_PROJECT_PATH/my-component@$CI_COMMIT_SHA
inputs:
stage: build
stages: [build, test, release]
# Check if `component job of my-component` is added.
# This example job could also test that the included component works as expected.
# You can inspect data generated by the component, use GitLab API endpoints, or third-party tools.
ensure-job-added:
stage: test
image: badouralix/curl-jq
# Replace "component job of my-component" with the job name in your component.
script:
- |
route="${CI_API_V4_URL}/projects/${CI_PROJECT_ID}/pipelines/${CI_PIPELINE_ID}/jobs"
count=`curl --silent "$route" | jq 'map(select(.name | contains("component job of my-component"))) | length'`
if [ "$count" != "1" ]; then
exit 1; else
echo "Component Job present"
fi
# If the pipeline is for a new tag with a semantic version, and all previous jobs succeed,
# create the release.
create-release:
stage: release
image: registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release-cli:latest
script: echo "Creating release $CI_COMMIT_TAG"
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG
release:
tag_name: $CI_COMMIT_TAG
description: "Release $CI_COMMIT_TAG of components repository $CI_PROJECT_PATH"
After committing and pushing changes, the pipeline tests the component, then creates a release if the earlier jobs pass.
Test a component against sample files
In some cases, components require source files to interact with. For example, a component that builds Go source code likely needs some samples of Go to test against. Alternatively, a component that builds Docker images likely needs some sample Dockerfiles to test against.
You can include sample files like these directly in the component project, to be used during component testing.
You can learn more in examples for testing a component.
Avoid hard-coding instance or project-specific values
When using another component in your component, use $CI_SERVER_FQDN
instead of your instance’s Fully Qualified Domain Name (like gitlab.com
).
When accessing the GitLab API in your component, use the $CI_API_V4_URL
instead of the
full URL and path for your instance (like https://gitlab.com/api/v4
).
These predefined variables ensure that your component also works when used on another instance, for example when using a GitLab.com component in a self-managed instance.
Do not assume API resources are always public
Ensure that the component and its testing pipeline work also in a self-managed instance. While some API resources of public projects on GitLab.com could be accessed via unauthenticated requests on self-managed a component project could be mirrored as private or internal project.
It’s important that an access token can optionally be provided via inputs or variables to authenticate requests on self-managed instances.
Avoid using global keywords
Avoid using global keywords in a component.
Using these keywords in a component affects all jobs in a pipeline, including jobs
directly defined in the main .gitlab-ci.yml
or in other included components.
As an alternative to global keywords:
- Add the configuration directly to each job, even if it creates some duplication in the component configuration.
- Use the
extends
keyword in the component, but use unique names that reduce the risk of naming conflicts when the component is merged into the configuration.
For example, avoid using the default
global keyword:
# Not recommended
default:
image: ruby:3.0
rspec-1:
script: bundle exec rspec dir1/
rspec-2:
script: bundle exec rspec dir2/
Instead, you can:
-
Add the configuration to each job explicitly:
rspec-1: image: ruby:3.0 script: bundle exec rspec dir1/ rspec-2: image: ruby:3.0 script: bundle exec rspec dir2/
-
Use
extends
to reuse configuration:.rspec-image: image: ruby:3.0 rspec-1: extends: - .rspec-image script: bundle exec rspec dir1/ rspec-2: extends: - .rspec-image script: bundle exec rspec dir2/
Replace hardcoded values with inputs
Avoid using hardcoded values in CI/CD components. Hardcoded values might force component users to need to review the component’s internal details and adapt their pipeline to work with the component.
A common keyword with problematic hard-coded values is stage
. If a component job’s
stage is hardcoded, all pipelines using the component must either define
the exact same stage, or override
the configuration.
The preferred method is to use the input
keyword for dynamic
component configuration. The component user can specify the exact value they need.
For example, to create a component with stage
configuration that can be defined by users:
-
In the component configuration:
spec: inputs: stage: default: test --- unit-test: stage: $[[ inputs.stage ]] script: echo unit tests integration-test: stage: $[[ inputs.stage ]] script: echo integration tests
-
In a project using the component:
stages: [verify, release] include: - component: $CI_SERVER_FQDN/myorg/ruby/test@1.0.0 inputs: stage: verify
Define job names with inputs
Similar to the values for the stage
keyword, you should avoid hard-coding job names
in CI/CD components. When your component’s users can customize job names, they can prevent conflicts
with the existing names in their pipelines. Users could also include a component
multiple times with different input options by using different names.
Use inputs
to allow your component’s users to define a specific job name, or a prefix for the
job name. For example:
spec:
inputs:
job-prefix:
description: "Define a prefix for the job name"
job-name:
description: "Alternatively, define the job's name"
job-stage:
default: test
---
"$[[ inputs.job-prefix ]]-scan-website":
stage: $[[ inputs.job-stage ]]
script:
- scan-website-1
"$[[ inputs.job-name ]]":
stage: $[[ inputs.job-stage ]]
script:
- scan-website-2
Replace custom CI/CD variables with inputs
When using CI/CD variables in a component, evaluate if the inputs
keyword
should be used instead. Avoid asking users to define custom variables to configure
components when inputs
is a better solution.
Inputs are explicitly defined in the component’s spec
section, and have better validation than variables.
For example, if a required input is not passed to the component, GitLab returns a pipeline error.
By contrast, if a variable is not defined, its value is empty, and there is no error.
For example, use inputs
instead of variables to configure a scanner’s output format:
-
In the component configuration:
spec: inputs: scanner-output: default: json --- my-scanner: script: my-scan --output $[[ inputs.scanner-output ]]
-
In the project using the component:
include: - component: $CI_SERVER_FQDN/path/to/project/my-scanner@1.0.0 inputs: scanner-output: yaml
In other cases, CI/CD variables might still be preferred. For example:
- Use predefined variables to automatically configure a component to match a user’s project.
- Ask users to store sensitive values as masked or protected CI/CD variables in project settings.
CI/CD Catalog
- Introduced as an experiment in GitLab 16.1.
- Moved to beta in GitLab 16.7.
- Made Generally Available in GitLab 17.0.
The CI/CD Catalog is a list of projects with published CI/CD components you can use to extend your CI/CD workflow.
Anyone can create a component project and add it to the CI/CD Catalog, or contribute to an existing project to improve the available components.
For a click-through demo, see the CI/CD Catalog beta Product Tour.
View the CI/CD Catalog
To access the CI/CD Catalog and view the published components that are available to you:
- On the left sidebar, select Search or go to.
- Select Explore.
- Select CI/CD Catalog.
Alternatively, if you are already in the pipeline editor in your project, you can select CI/CD Catalog.
Visibility of components in the CI/CD catalog follows the component source project’s visibility setting. Components with source projects set to:
- Private are visible only to users assigned at least the Guest role for the source component project.
- Internal are visible only to users logged into the GitLab instance.
- Public are visible to anyone with access to the GitLab instance.
Publish a component project
To publish a component project in the CI/CD catalog, you must:
- Set the project as a catalog project.
- Publish a new release.
Set a component project as a catalog project
To make published versions of a component project visible in the CI/CD catalog, you must set the project as a catalog project.
Prerequisites:
- You must have the Owner role for the project.
To set the project as a catalog project:
- On the left sidebar, select Search or go to and find your project.
- Select Settings > General.
- Expand Visibility, project features, permissions.
- Turn on the CI/CD Catalog project toggle.
The project only becomes findable in the catalog after you publish a new release.
To use automation to enable this setting, you can use the mutationcatalogresourcescreate
GraphQL endpoint. Issue 463043
proposes to expose this in the REST API as well.
Publish a new release
CI/CD components can be used without being listed in the CI/CD catalog. However, publishing a component’s releases in the catalog makes it discoverable to other users.
Prerequisites:
- You must have at least the Maintainer role for the project.
- The project must:
- Be set as a catalog project.
- Have a project description defined.
- Have a
README.md
file in the root directory for the commit SHA of the tag being released. - Have at least one CI/CD component in the
templates/
directory for the commit SHA of the tag being released.
To publish a new version of the component to the catalog:
-
Add a job to the project’s
.gitlab-ci.yml
file that uses therelease
keyword to create the new release when a tag is created. You should configure the tag pipeline to test the components before running the release job. For example:create-release: stage: release image: registry.gitlab.com/gitlab-org/release-cli:latest script: echo "Creating release $CI_COMMIT_TAG" rules: - if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG release: tag_name: $CI_COMMIT_TAG description: "Release $CI_COMMIT_TAG of components in $CI_PROJECT_PATH"
-
Create a new tag for the release, which should trigger a tag pipeline that contains the job responsible for creating the release. The tag must use semantic versioning.
After the release job completes successfully, the release is created and the new version is published to the CI/CD catalog.
Semantic versioning
- Introduced in GitLab 16.10.
When tagging and releasing new versions of components to the Catalog, you must use semantic versioning. Semantic versioning is the standard for communicating that a change is a major, minor, patch, or other kind of change.
For example, 1.0.0
, 2.3.4
, and 1.0.0-alpha
are all valid semantic versions.
Unpublish a component project
To remove a component project from the catalog, turn off the CI/CD Catalog resource toggle in the project settings.
To publish the component project in the catalog again, you need to publish a new release.
Verified component creators
- Introduced in GitLab 16.11
Some CI/CD components are badged with an icon to show that the component was created and is maintained by users verified by GitLab:
- GitLab-maintained (): Components that are created and maintained by GitLab.
-
GitLab Partner (): Components that are independently created and maintained by a GitLab-verified partner.
GitLab partners can contact a member of the GitLab Partner Alliance to have their namespace flagged as GitLab-verified. Then any CI/CD components located in the namespace are badged as GitLab Partner components. The Partner Alliance member creates an internal request issue on behalf of the verified partner:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support/internal-requests/-/issues/new?issuable_template=CI%20Catalog%20Badge%20Request
.GitLab Partner-created components are provided as-is, without warranty of any kind. An end user’s use of a GitLab Partner-created component is at their own risk and GitLab shall have no indemnification obligations nor any liability of any type with respect to the end user’s use of the component. The end user’s use of such content and any liability related thereto shall be between the publisher of the content and the end user.
Convert a CI/CD template to a component
Any existing CI/CD template that you use in projects by using the include:
syntax
can be converted to a CI/CD component:
- Decide if you want the component to be grouped with other components as part of an existing component project, or create a new component project.
- Create a YAML file in the component project according to the directory structure.
- Copy the content of the original template YAML file into the new component YAML file.
- Refactor the new component’s configuration to:
- Follow the guidance on writing a component.
- Improve the configuration, for example by enabling merge request pipelines or making it more efficient.
- Leverage the
.gitlab-ci.yml
in the components repository to test changes to the component. - Tag and release the component.
You can learn more by following a practical example for migrating the Go CI/CD template to CI/CD component.
Use a GitLab.com component in a self-managed instance
The CI/CD catalog of a fresh install of a GitLab instance starts with no published CI/CD components. To populate your instance’s catalog, you can:
- Publish your own components.
- Mirror components from GitLab.com in your self-managed instance.
To mirror a GitLab.com component in your self-managed instance:
- Make sure that network outbound requests are allowed for
gitlab.com
. -
Create a group to host the component projects (recommended group:
components
). - Create a mirror of the component project in the new group.
- Write a project description for the component project mirror because mirroring repositories does not copy the description.
- Set the self-hosted component project as a catalog resource.
- Publish a new release in the self-hosted component project by running a pipeline for a tag (usually the latest tag).
CI/CD component security best practices
For component users
As anyone can publish components to the catalog, you should carefully review components before using them in your project. Use of GitLab CI/CD components is at your own risk and GitLab cannot guarantee the security of third-party components.
When using third-party CI/CD components, consider the following security best practices:
- Audit and review component source code: Carefully examine the code to ensure it’s free of malicious content.
-
Minimize access to credentials and tokens:
- Audit the component’s source code to verify that any credentials or tokens are only used to perform actions that you expect and authorize.
- Use minimally scoped access tokens.
- Avoid using long-lived access tokens or credentials.
- Audit use of credentials and tokens used by CI/CD components.
-
Use pinned versions: Pin CI/CD components to a specific commit SHA (preferred)
or release version tag to ensure the integrity of the component used in a pipeline.
Only use release tags if you trust the component maintainer. Avoid using
latest
. - Store secrets securely: Do not store secrets in CI/CD configuration files. Avoid storing secrets and credentials in project settings if you can use an external secret management solution instead.
- Use ephemeral, isolated runner environments: Run component jobs in temporary, isolated environments when possible. Be aware of security risks with self-managed GitLab Runners.
- Securely handle cache and artifacts: Do not pass cache or artifacts from other jobs in your pipeline to CI/CD component jobs unless absolutely necessary.
-
Limit CI_JOB_TOKEN access: Restrict CI/CD job token (
CI_JOB_TOKEN
) project access and permissions for projects using CI/CD components. - Review CI/CD component changes: Carefully review all changes to the CI/CD component configuration before changing to use an updated commit SHA or release tag for the component.
- Audit custom container images: Carefully review any custom container images used by the CI/CD component to ensure they are free of malicious content.
For component maintainers
To maintain secure and trustworthy CI/CD components and ensure the integrity of the pipeline configuration you deliver to users, follow these best practices:
- Use two-factor authentication (2FA): Ensure all CI/CD component project maintainers and owners have 2FA enabled, or enforce 2FA for all users in the group.
-
Use protected branches:
- Use protected branches for component project releases.
- Protect the default branch, and protect all release branches using wildcard rules.
- Require everyone submit merge requests for changes to protected branches. Set the
Allowed to push and merge option to
No one
for protected branches. - Block force pushes to protected branches.
- Sign all commits: Sign all commits to the component project.
-
Discourage using
latest
: Avoid including examples in yourREADME.md
that use@latest
. - Limit dependency on caches and artifacts from other jobs: Only use cache and artifacts from other jobs in CI/CD components if absolutely necessary
- Update CI/CD component dependencies: Check for and apply updates to dependencies regularly.
-
Review changes carefully:
- Carefully review all changes to the CI/CD component pipeline configuration before merging into default or release branches.
- Use merge request approvals for all user-facing changes to CI/CD component catalog projects.
Troubleshooting
content not found
message
You might receive an error message similar to the following when using the ~latest
version qualifier to reference a component hosted by a catalog project:
This GitLab CI configuration is invalid: Component 'gitlab.com/my-namespace/my-project/my-component@~latest' - content not found
The ~latest
behavior was updated
in GitLab 16.10. It now refers to the latest semantic version of the catalog resource. To resolve this issue, create a new release.
Error: Build component error: Spec must be a valid json schema
If a component has invalid formatting, you might not be able to create a release
and could receive an error like Build component error: Spec must be a valid json schema
.
This error can be caused by an empty spec:inputs
section. If your configuration
does not use any inputs, you can make the spec
section empty instead. For example:
spec:
---
my-component:
script: echo