- 1. Definition
- 2. Data flow
- 3. Proposal
- 4. Evaluation
- 4.1. Pros
- 4.2. Cons
This document is a work-in-progress and represents a very early state of the Cells design. Significant aspects are not documented, though we expect to add them in the future. This is one possible architecture for Cells, and we intend to contrast this with alternatives before deciding which approach to implement. This documentation will be kept even if we decide not to implement this so that we can document the reasons for not choosing this approach.
Each cells will take its own backups, and consequently have its own isolated backup / restore procedure.
GitLab Backup takes a backup of the PostgreSQL database used by the application, and also Git repository data.
2. Data flow
Each cell has a number of application databases to back up (e.g.
Additionally, there may be cluster-wide metadata tables (e.g.
which is directly accesible via PostgreSQL.
3.1. Cluster-wide metadata
It is currently unknown how cluster-wide metadata tables will be accessible. We may choose to have cluster-wide metadata tables backed up separately, or have each cell back up its copy of cluster-wide metdata tables.
3.2.1 Take backups independently
As each cell will communicate with each other via API, and there will be no joins to the users table, it should be acceptable for each cell to take a backup independently of each other.
3.2.2 Enforce snapshots
We can require that each cell take a snapshot for the PostgreSQL databases at around the same time to allow for a consistent-enough backup.
As the number of cells increases, it will likely not be feasible to take a snapshot at the same time for all cells. Hence taking backups independently is the better option.