Resource usage

Resource Requests

All of our containers include predefined resource request values. By default we have not put resource limits into place. But we recommend users set limits, particularly on memory if they are running on nodes without a lot of excess memory capacity. (You want to avoid running out of memory on any of your Kubernetes nodes, as the Kernel memory killer may end essential Kube processes)

In order to come up with our default request values, we run the application, and come up with a way to generate various levels of load for each service. We monitor the service, and make a call on what we think is the best default value.

We will measure:

  • Idle Load - No default should be below these values, but an idle process isn’t useful, so typically we will not set a default based on this value.

  • Minimal Load - The values required to do the most basic useful amount of work. Typically, for CPU, this will be used as the default, but memory requests come with the risk of the Kernel reaping processes, so we will avoid using this as a memory default.

  • Average Loads - What is considered average is highly dependent on the installation, for our defaults we will attempt to take a few measurements at a few of what we consider reasonable loads. (we will list the loads used). If the service has a pod autoscaler, we will typically try to set the scaling target value based on these. And also the default memory requests.

  • Stressful Task - Measure the usage of the most stressful task the service should perform. (Not necessary under load). When applying resource limits, try and set the limit above this and the average load values.

  • Heavy Load - Try and come up with a stress test for the service, then measure the resource usage required to do it. We currently don’t use these values for any defaults, but users will likely want to set resource limits somewhere between the average loads/stress task and this value.

GitLab Shell

Load was tested using a bash loop calling nohup git clone <project> <random-path-name> in order to have some concurrency. In future tests we will try to include sustained concurrent load, to better match the types of tests we have done for the other services.

  • Idle values
    • 0 tasks, 2 pods
      • cpu: 0
      • memory: 5M
  • Minimal Load
    • 1 tasks (one empty clone), 2 pods
      • cpu: 0
      • memory: 5M
  • Average Loads
    • 5 concurrent clones, 2 pods
      • cpu: 0.1
      • memory: 5M
    • 20 concurrent clones, 2 pods
      • cpu: 0.08
      • memory: 6M
  • Stressful Task
    • SSH clone the Linux kernel (17MB/s)
      • CPU: 0.28
      • memory: 17M
    • SSH push the Linux kernel (2MB/s)
      • CPU: 0.14
      • memory: 13M
      • Upload connection speed was likely a factor during our tests
  • Heavy Load
    • 100 concurrent clones, 4 pods
      • cpu: 0.11
      • memory: 7M
  • Default Requests
    • CPU: 0 (from minimal load)
    • memory: 6M (from average load)
    • target CPU average: 0.1 (from average loads)
  • Recommended Limits
    • CPU: > 0.3 (greater than stress task)
    • memory: > 20M (greater than stress task)


Webservice resources were analyzed during testing with the 10k reference architecture. Notes can be found in the Webservice resources documentation.


Sidekiq resources were analyzed during testing with the 10k reference architecture. Notes can be found in the Sidekiq resources documentation.