- What warrants a changelog entry?
- Writing good changelog entries
- How to generate a changelog entry
This guide contains instructions for when and how to generate a changelog entry file, as well as information and history about our changelog process.
Each bullet point, or entry, in our
file is generated from the subject line of a Git commit. Commits are included
when they contain the
Changelog Git trailer.
When generating the changelog, author and merge request details are added
Changelog trailer accepts the following values:
added: New feature
fixed: Bug fix
changed: Feature change
deprecated: New deprecation
removed: Feature removal
security: Security fix
performance: Performance improvement
An example of a Git commit to include in the changelog is the following:
Update git vendor to gitlab Now that we are using gitaly to compile git, the git version isn't known from the manifest, instead we are getting the gitaly version. Update our vendor field to be `gitlab` to avoid cve matching old versions. Changelog: changed
GitLab automatically links the merge request to the commit when generating the
changelog. If you want to override the merge request to link to, you can specify
an alternative merge request using the
Update git vendor to gitlab Now that we are using gitaly to compile git, the git version isn't known from the manifest, instead we are getting the gitaly version. Update our vendor field to be `gitlab` to avoid cve matching old versions. Changelog: changed MR: https://gitlab.com/foo/bar/-/merge_requests/123
The value must be the full URL of the merge request.
If a change is for GitLab Enterprise Edition, you must also add the trailer
Update git vendor to gitlab Now that we are using gitaly to compile git, the git version isn't known from the manifest, instead we are getting the gitaly version. Update our vendor field to be `gitlab` to avoid cve matching old versions. Changelog: changed MR: https://gitlab.com/foo/bar/-/merge_requests/123 EE: true
- Any change that introduces a database migration, whether it’s regular, post, or data migration, must have a changelog entry, even if it is behind a disabled feature flag.
must have a changelog entry, with
Changelogtrailer set to
- Any user-facing change must have a changelog entry. Example: “GitLab now uses system fonts for all text.”
- Any client-facing change to our REST and GraphQL APIs must have a changelog entry. See the complete list what comprises a GraphQL breaking change.
- Any change that introduces an Advanced Search migration must have a changelog entry.
- A fix for a regression introduced and then fixed in the same release (such as fixing a bug introduced during a monthly release candidate) should not have a changelog entry.
- Any developer-facing change (such as refactoring, technical debt remediation, or test suite changes) should not have a changelog entry. Example: “Reduce database records created during Cycle Analytics model spec.”
- Any contribution from a community member, no matter how small, may have a changelog entry regardless of these guidelines if the contributor wants one.
- Any GLEX experiment changes should not have a changelog entry.
- Removing a feature flag, when the new code is retained.
A good changelog entry should be descriptive and concise. It should explain the change to a reader who has zero context about the change. If you have trouble making it both concise and descriptive, err on the side of descriptive.
- Bad: Go to a project order.
- Good: Show a user’s starred projects at the top of the “Go to project” dropdown.
The first example provides no context of where the change was made, or why, or how it benefits the user.
- Bad: Copy (some text) to clipboard.
- Good: Update the “Copy to clipboard” tooltip to indicate what’s being copied.
Again, the first example is too vague and provides no context.
- Bad: Fixes and Improves CSS and HTML problems in mini pipeline graph and builds dropdown.
- Good: Fix tooltips and hover states in mini pipeline graph and builds dropdown.
The first example is too focused on implementation details. The user doesn’t care that we changed CSS and HTML, they care about the end result of those changes.
Bad: Strip out
nils in the Array of Commit objects returned from
- Good: Fix 500 errors caused by Elasticsearch results referencing garbage-collected commits
The first example focuses on how we fixed something, not on what it fixes. The rewritten version clearly describes the end benefit to the user (fewer 500 errors), and when (searching commits with Elasticsearch).
Use your best judgement and try to put yourself in the mindset of someone reading the compiled changelog. Does this entry add value? Does it offer context about where and why the change was made?
Git trailers are added when committing your changes. This can be done using your
text editor of choice. Adding the trailer to an existing commit requires either
amending to the commit (if it’s the most recent one), or an interactive rebase
git rebase -i.
To update the last commit, run the following:
git commit --amend
You can then add the
Changelog trailer to the commit message. If you had
already pushed prior commits to your remote branch, you have to force push
the new commit:
git push -f origin your-branch-name
To edit older (or multiple commits), use
git rebase -i HEAD~N where
N is the
last N number of commits to rebase. Let’s say you have 3 commits on your branch:
A, B, and C. If you want to update commit B, you need to run:
git rebase -i HEAD~2
This starts an interactive rebase session for the last two commits. When started, Git presents you with a text editor with contents along the lines of the following:
pick B Subject of commit B pick C Subject of commit C
To update commit B, change the word
reword, then save and quit the
editor. Once closed, Git presents you with a new text editor instance to edit
the commit message of commit B. Add the trailer, then save and quit the editor.
If all went well, commit B is now updated.
For more information about interactive rebases, take a look at the Git documentation.