- Groups and Projects
- Permission dependencies
There are multiple types of permissions across GitLab, and when implementing anything that deals with permissions, all of them should be considered.
Groups and projects can have the following visibility levels:
- public (20) - an entity is visible to everyone
- internal (10) - an entity is visible to logged in users
- private (0) - an entity is visible only to the approved members of the entity
The visibility level of a group can be changed only if all subgroups and subprojects have the same or lower visibility level. (e.g., a group can be set to internal only if all subgroups and projects are internal or private).
Visibility levels can be found in the
Additionally, the following project features can have different visibility levels:
- Merge Request
- Container Registry
- Git Large File Storage
These features can be set to “Everyone with Access” or “Only Project Members”. They make sense only for public or internal projects because private projects can be accessed only by project members by default.
Users can be members of multiple groups and projects. The following access
levels are available (defined in the
If a user is the member of both a project and the project parent group, the higher permission is taken into account for the project.
If a user is the member of a project, but not the parent group (or groups), they can still view the groups and their entities (like epics).
Project membership (where the group membership is already taken into account)
is stored in the
Confidential issues can be accessed only by project members who are at least reporters (they can’t be accessed by guests). Additionally they can be accessed by their authors and assignees.
Some features can be accessed only if the user has the correct license plan.
Feature policies can be quite complex and consist of multiple rules. Quite often, one permission can be based on another.
Designing good permissions means reusing existing permissions as much as possible and making access to features granular.
In the case of a complex resource, it should be broken into smaller pieces of information and each piece should be granted a different permission.
A good example in this case is the Merge Request widget and the Security reports. Depending on the visibility level of the Pipelines, the Security reports will be either visible in the widget or not. So, the Merge Request widget, the Pipelines, and the Security reports, have separate permissions. Moreover, the permissions for the Merge Request widget and the Pipelines are dependencies of the Security reports.
Secure features have complex permissions since these features are integrated into different features like Merge Requests and CI flow.
Here is a list of some permission dependencies.
|Activity level||Resource||Locations||Permission dependency|
|View||License information||Dependency list, License Compliance||Can view repo|
|View||Dependency information||Dependency list, License Compliance||Can view repo|
|View||Vulnerabilities information||Dependency list||Can view security findings|
|View||Black/Whitelisted licenses for the project||License Compliance, Merge request||Can view repo|
|View||Security findings||Merge Request, CI job page, Pipeline security tab||Can read the project and CI jobs|
|View||Vulnerability feedback||Merge Request||Can read security findings|
|View||Dependency List page||Project||Can access Dependency information|
|View||License Compliance page||Project||Can access License information|